See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Thaler - August Zwitter-Taler

Issuer Saxony (Albertinian Line), Electorate of
Year 1557
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight 29.0 g
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Armored bust of Elector August I facing right, sword borne over right shoulder, with the date divided at left and right of the portrait. Two small shields of arms — electoral Saxony and ducal Saxony — appear below the bust. The surrounding Latin legend carries the titles of August I, Elector of Saxony.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage 1557 - 1557//1557
Additional information

The "Zwitter-Taler" designation is not a quality assessment — it refers to a mule, a coin struck from dies that were never intended to be paired together. This specific pairing combines obverse and reverse dies from different intended issues of the August taler series, almost certainly the result of a deliberate decision at the Dresden or Annaberg mint rather than an accident, since the physical labor of changing dies made unintentional mismatches essentially impossible under supervised production.

August, Elector of Saxony from 1553, aggressively expanded Saxon silver output from the Erzgebirge mines during precisely this period. The Zwitter designation in Schnee and Keil/Kahnt acknowledges this as a recognized variant, not an error to be dismissed.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE