Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Tibet |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 1763-1764 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Tangka (1640-1959) |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | Central dharma wheel (dharmachakra) enclosed within a single circle, surrounded by eight Vartula (Ranjana script) characters, one inscribed within each petal of an eight-petalled lotus flower. The composition mirrors the obverse in layout and Tibeto-Newar artistic convention, but is distinguished by the use of a single bounding circle rather than a double circle. The lotus petals radiate symmetrically from the central wheel device. |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | ND (1763-1764) |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
The Vartula tangka series represents one of the earliest attempts by Tibetan authorities to standardize coinage under Qing oversight, following the political turbulence of the 1750s — specifically the Dzungar invasion and subsequent Chinese military intervention. The double circle / single circle die pairing catalogued under C#5.1 is one of several distinct varieties from this brief issue window, and the differences in circle count reflect actual die changes rather than mint error.
These coins were hand-struck using local silver, and weight consistency across the series is poor. The 1763–64 dating is itself approximate, reconstructed from Tibetan calendrical records cross-referenced against Qing administrative documents.