| Эмитент | Alwar, Princely state of |
|---|---|
| Год | 1815-1833 |
| Тип | Standard circulation coin |
| Номинал | 1 Takka (1⁄32) |
| Валюта | Rupee |
| Состав | Copper |
| Вес | 18.2 g |
| Диаметр | 19 mm |
| Толщина | |
| Форма | Round (irregular) |
| Техника | |
| Ориентация | |
| Гравёр(ы) | |
| В обращении до | |
| Каталожные номера | KM#15 |
| Описание аверса | |
|---|---|
| Письменность аверса | |
| Надписи аверса | Muhammad Akbar II |
| Описание реверса | |
| Письменность реверса | |
| Надписи реверса | |
| Гурт | Plain |
| Монетный двор | |
| Тираж |
ND (1815-1833) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 1155008100 |
| Дополнительная информация |
Historical Context: The Alwar 1 Takka, issued 1815-1833, epitomizes the complex political tapestry of early 19th-century India. Although nominally struck in the name of the Mughal Emperor Muhammad Akbar II, Alwar was a Rajput princely state operating firmly under British paramountcy, having become a protectorate in 1803. This copper issue served local commerce within a state maintaining internal autonomy but externally controlled. The continued use of the Mughal emperor's name on coinage was a deeply ingrained tradition of legitimacy, even as Mughal power waned and British influence consolidated across the subcontinent.
Artistry: Numismatic artistry of Alwar during this period largely adhered to the debased Mughal stylistic tradition. Designs are characterized by calligraphic Persian/Urdu legends, typically featuring the nominal emperor's name, regnal year, and mint, often within simple dotted or linear borders. The focus was on legibility and symbolic continuity rather than elaborate pictorial devices, reflecting Islamic aniconism. Specific engraver signatures are not typically identified for these utilitarian copper issues, with variations often attributable to individual die cutters within the state's mint workshop rather than named artisans.
Technical/Grading: For grading this 1 Takka, critical points include the clarity and completeness of the Persian legends, particularly the nominal emperor's name and the Hijri date, which are frequently weakly struck or off-flan due to manual striking methods. The overall strike quality, common for hand-struck copper coinage, significantly impacts grade; a well-centered strike with full details on both obverse and reverse is rare. Wear will first manifest on the raised elements of the script. Original flan irregularities, such as lamination or unevenness, should be carefully distinguished from post-strike damage.