Catalog
| Issuer | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
|---|---|
| Year | 1797-1818 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Round |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Retrograde cursive 'S' visible in raised relief within a rectangular incuse counterstamp punch, representing the mirror impression of the obverse counterstamp as it was driven through the host coin's planchet. The surrounding field is plain and heavily worn, consistent with the host coin's original reverse design having been largely effaced. This incuse reverse impression is characteristic of the Type II Saint Vincent stampee counterstamp series applied to circulating Spanish colonial or other silver host coinage. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The stampee was a cut and countermarked fragment of Spanish colonial silver, deliberately debased by alloying or simply worn beyond recovery, pressed into service during a chronic small-change shortage that plagued the British Caribbean throughout the late eighteenth century. Saint Vincent's monetary situation was particularly acute — the island's plantation economy generated substantial trade but almost no reliable petty coinage, forcing colonial authorities to authorize these makeshift billon pieces rather than wait on London's chronically slow supply responses. The Type II designation distinguishes a second countermark application, suggesting at least some of these pieces were re-validated after initial circulation.