Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| Year | 501-600 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Barbarian imitations of Byzantine solidi proliferated across the post-Roman West as Germanic successor states lacked both the monetary infrastructure and, initially, the political legitimacy to strike coinage in their own names. Issuing gold in the name of a reigning or recently deceased emperor was a pragmatic solution — it guaranteed acceptance in trade networks still calibrated to Byzantine weight standards.
Anastasius I reformed the Byzantine coinage system in 498, stabilizing the solidus at a fineness that made it the dominant trade currency across the Mediterranean for generations. The imitations it inspired vary enormously in execution, from near-mint-quality Ostrogothic products to crude Frankish copies struck from dies cut by craftsmen working purely from worn exemplars.