Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | England |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1651 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | 1 Shilling (1/20) |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Latin |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Milled |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
This piece dates to the Interregnum, when England's mint faced an acute ideological problem: what to put on coins when you've just executed the king. The Commonwealth's answer was to strip royal imagery entirely and replace it with heraldic shields — a decision made by Parliament in 1649 that broke with centuries of English numismatic convention. Pattern strikes from 1651 predate the fully authorized Commonwealth shilling series and were likely produced to demonstrate acceptable designs to parliamentary committees.
The dies were cut by Thomas Simon, the most accomplished engraver of the period, who had previously worked under the Crown.