Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

1 Sextans Augur / Sacrificial implements

Uitgever Uncertain Etruscan mint
Jaar 240 BC - 225 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter 31 mm
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Sacrificial implements of the augural ritual arranged in the field: a makaira (curved sacrificial knife) and a secespita (a straight-bladed ritual axe), rendered in flat relief. Two pellets confirming the sextans denomination appear at centre, with a crescent symbol positioned to the right. The design is characteristic of Etruscan aes grave coinage, with devices boldly struck and simply delineated against a plain field.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The Etruscan bronze series to which this sextans belongs was struck during a period when Rome's influence over Etruria had become effectively total — the final Etruscan resistance had collapsed at Volsinii in 264 BC, and by the time these coins were produced, the issuing communities were operating under Roman oversight, if not outright Roman direction. The sextans denomination fits within a libral or sub-libral weight standard that mirrors Roman aes grave practice, suggesting deliberate alignment with the Roman monetary system rather than independent Etruscan tradition.

Attributing these pieces to a specific mint remains genuinely difficult. The ICC and HN Italy references group them under uncertain Etruscan production, and that uncertainty is not false modesty — provenance clustering has not produced a consensus findspot.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT