Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Vetulonia |
|---|---|
| Year | 217 BC - 215 BC |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Vecchi-V#3, HN Italy#199, EC 1#5, Vicari#17, SNG Firenze 2#666 |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Plain blank reverse with no devices, inscriptions, or decorative elements, consistent with the Series I Semuncia coinage of Vetulonia. The surface shows the rough, uneven texture typical of hammered or cast Etruscan bronze flans of this period. Traces of casting or striking stress lines may be visible across the field. The absence of any reverse type is a defining characteristic of this emission. Patination is a uniform dark green, indicative of long burial. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Vetulonia |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Vetulonia was among the Etruscan cities that issued bronze coinage in the late 3rd century BC, a period when Rome's catastrophic defeat at Lake Trasimene in 217 BC destabilized the entire Italian peninsula and forced even nominally allied communities to reckon with their monetary arrangements. Whether this issue reflects Vetulonian autonomy, a practical response to bronze shortages, or some degree of Roman-adjacent monetary organization remains debated — the city's numismatic output was small and its political circumstances during the Hannibalic War imperfectly documented. The blank reverse is not damage; it is the intended design for this denomination and series.