目录
为什么需要注册?只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证!
| 发行方 | Livonian Order and Archbishopric of Riga |
|---|---|
| 年份 | 1553-1554 |
| 类型 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 面值 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 货币 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 材质 | Billon (.1875 silver) |
| 重量 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 直径 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 厚度 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 形状 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 制作工艺 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 方向 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 雕刻师 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 流通至 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 参考资料 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 正面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | Latin |
| 正面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 边缘 | Plain |
| 铸币厂 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸造量 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 附加信息 |
This joint issue emerged from one of the more awkward political arrangements in Baltic history: the Livonian Order and the Archbishopric of Riga were frequently at odds, yet economic necessity periodically forced them into cooperative coinage agreements. By the early 1550s, both parties were operating under existential pressure — Ivan IV was consolidating power to the east, and the fragmented Livonian Confederation lacked the unity to respond coherently. The monetary union this schilling represents was less a sign of partnership than a pragmatic stopgap.
Wilhelm von Brandenburg-Ansbach, the Archbishop, was himself a Hohenzollern — his presence in Riga a reminder of how thoroughly German dynastic politics had penetrated the Baltic ecclesiastical structure by this period.