目录
查看完整图片 — 免费注册
使用Google继续 — 免费
或用邮箱注册
为什么需要注册？只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证！
| 正面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 正面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面描述 | Hammered silver flan with a two-line Persian legend in the field, divided by a horizontal rule. The upper register reads 'Zarb Chinchwar' (struck at Chinchwad), and the lower register contains the formula 'Sana Julus Maimanat Manus' (regnal year of auspicious accession), identifying the mint and the regal year of Shah Alam II. The bold Nastaliq script is characteristic of Maratha issues struck in the name of the Mughal emperor. The numerals indicate regnal year 6, corresponding to AH 1189 (1775 CE). Edges are irregular, consistent with hammered coinage of the period. |
| 背面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 边缘 | Plain |
| 铸币厂 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸造量 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 附加信息 |
Ali Gauhar was the Mughal emperor Shah Alam II, whose name appeared on Maratha-controlled mint output as a political fiction — the Marathas struck coins in his name while holding effective power across much of the subcontinent. By 1775, Shah Alam was increasingly a puppet, his authority nominal following the catastrophic Maratha defeat at Panipat in 1761 and his subsequent dependence on various protectors. Chinchwar, near Pune, was a minor mint within the Maratha confederacy's administrative reach.
The continued use of Mughal imperial nomenclature on Maratha issues was deliberate — it conferred legitimacy on coinage that might otherwise face rejection in trade.