See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Rouble Revenue Stamp - Type 1

Issuer Chita Branch of the State Bank (Russia - Civil war issues)
Year 1918
Type Local banknote
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Size Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Log in to see details
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse lettering ЧИТИНСКОЕ ОТДЕЛѢНИЕ Государственнаго Банка. Имѣетъ хожденіе наравнѣ съ кредитными билетами в предѣлахъ Забайкальской области. Гербовая марки 1 рубль 1 Читинское Отделение Государственного Банка
(Translation: CHITA BRANCH OF THE STATE BANK. Valid for use in the Transbaikal region on a par with credit notes. Revenue Stamp 1 rouble 1 Chita Branch of the State Bank)
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Official stamp
Protection description Log in to see details
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

The Chita branch operated under the authority of the Provisional Siberian Government and later the administration aligned with Ataman Semenov, making its emergency issues among the more politically tangled of the Far Eastern Civil War period. Conventional banking infrastructure had effectively collapsed east of the Urals by mid-1918, and branches improvised currency from whatever materials were at hand — in this case, revenue stamp blanks repurposed as rouble denominations.

Using fiscal paper as a monetary substrate was not unique to Chita, but the Type 1 designation signals that at least a second variant followed, implying the branch issued in sufficient volume or across enough distinct officializations to require cataloguers to distinguish between them.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE