See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Rijksdaalder piedfort of quadruple weight

Issuer Mint of West Friesland (Dutch Republic)
Year 1651
Type Log in to see details
Value Rijksdaalder (2.25)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Latin
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description The crowned coat of arms of the Dutch Republic, displaying a rampant lion within a shield surmounted by an elaborate royal crown with fleurs-de-lis, occupies the central field, with the date 1651 divided to either side. The entire design is enclosed within a beaded inner border, and the provincial motto legend runs continuously around the outer margin in capital Roman letters. The irregular flan and thick fabric are consistent with the quadruple-weight piedfort striking.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Piedforts of this weight — four times the standard Rijksdaalder flan — were never produced for circulation. The Mint of West Friesland struck these almost certainly as presentation pieces, likely for gift exchange among civic officials or foreign dignitaries, a practice deeply embedded in Dutch Republic diplomatic culture by the mid-seventeenth century. West Friesland was among the more independent-minded of the provincial mints, frequently producing off-metal and overweight specials that deviated from the Union of Utrecht's monetary conventions with apparent impunity.

The Delmonte S#940b attribution places this firmly within the specialist piedfort literature rather than general coinage catalogues — unsurprising given that surviving examples are counted in single digits.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE