Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| Year | 250-325 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Germanic imitations of Roman gold coinage began appearing in substantial numbers during the third century, as tribal elites accumulated Roman solidi and quinarii through mercenary service, trade, and subsidy payments — then reproduced them locally, often with degraded legends and blundered iconography. That this piece imitates Elagabalus specifically is worth noting: his reign lasted only four years before his murder in 222, making his issues a relatively narrow template for copyists working a generation or more after the originals circulated.
The Boutin reference gap signals how poorly documented this particular imitative series remains. Attribution to Germanic tribes is conventional rather than precise — provenance and die study remain the only reliable path toward narrowing the issuing group.