See full images — free registration
Continue with Google — it's free or register with email

1 Quadrans

Issuer Uncertain city of Central Italy
Year 301 BC - 201 BC
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) ICC#294, HN Italy#374, Haeberlin#p.163, Thurlow-Ve#212, Syd#177
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description A prow of a galley facing right, depicted in a bold, schematic style typical of Central Italian aes grave coinage of the third to second century BC. The prow is rendered with a projecting ram at the waterline and a series of horizontal oar ports or strakes above, a motif closely associated with Roman and Italic monetary iconography of this period. Three pellets, denoting the quadrans value, appear in the field. The overall execution is robust but summary, reflecting the hand-worked nature of the hammered bronze flan. The reverse field is irregular and heavily worn, consistent with the coin's considerable age and circulation history.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (301 BC - 201 BC) - Unique
Additional information

Heavy cast bronze of this weight class belongs to the aes grave tradition, produced by cities whose identities remain genuinely disputed among scholars — the attribution "uncertain Central Italy" is not a cataloging shortcut but reflects a real gap in the epigraphic and archaeological record. The third century BC saw numerous communities issuing cast bronze on the Roman libral standard before Rome's military consolidation rendered local monetary production obsolete. Haeberlin's foundational 1910 study remains the primary typological anchor for pieces like this, and his page 163 attribution has not been meaningfully revised since.