目录
为什么需要注册?只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证!
| 发行方 | Livonian Order and Archbishopric of Riga |
|---|---|
| 年份 | 1509-1524 |
| 类型 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 面值 | 1 Pfennig = ⅓ Schilling |
| 货币 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 材质 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 重量 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 直径 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 厚度 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 形状 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 制作工艺 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 方向 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 雕刻师 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 流通至 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 参考资料 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 正面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 正面铭文 | MON - MAG - LIV - ONI - (Translation: Moneta Magistri Livoniae Coin of the Master of Livonia) |
| 背面描述 | Central field bears a stylized heraldic device, likely a simplified representation of the arms of the Archbishopric of Riga, depicted as a roughly circular organic form with root-like extensions, characteristic of the crude die-cutting of this small hammered denomination. The motif is enclosed within a plain inner ring. The surrounding circular legend in uncial Latin reads MONE · AR · EPIS · R, an abbreviation of Moneta Archi Episcopus Rigensis, identifying the coin as struck under the authority of the Archbishop of Riga. The strike is irregular and the coin shows typical characteristics of early sixteenth-century Livonian billon pfennigs. |
| 背面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 边缘 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸币厂 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸造量 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 附加信息 |
Wolter von Plettenberg's tenure as Landmaster of the Livonian Order from 1494 to 1535 coincided with the most acute phase of the Russian threat to the eastern Baltic — his victory at Smolina in 1502 temporarily halted Muscovite expansion and bought the Order roughly two decades of relative stability, the precise window in which this joint coinage with Archbishop Jasper Linde was produced. The dual-authority arrangement behind these issues reflected a long-running and frequently antagonistic power-sharing obligation between the Order and the Archbishopric, formalized through repeated imperial and papal arbitrations rather than genuine cooperation.
The "bumpy bottom" die variety cataloged under Haljak II#412 distinguishes this from otherwise near-identical Riga pfennig issues of the period — a small but diagnostically useful feature in a series where die identification is the primary means of attribution.