Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Frisia |
|---|---|
| Year | 1038-1057 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | The ruler's name inscribed between two horizontal beaded or reeded lines dividing the field, with the mint name of Leeuwarden split between the upper and lower registers. The design is framed by a beaded inner circle and an outer legend, presented in the terse, abbreviated epigraphic style characteristic of Frisian deniers struck under Count Bruno III. The flat, irregular flan and coarse lettering reflect typical provincial hammered technique of the period. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Leeuwarden |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Bruno III ruled Frisia as a minor under the regency of his mother Gertrude of Saxony following the death of his father Egbert I, and the coins struck in his name reflect the political fragility of the county during those years. Leeuwarden functioned as a regional minting center in a territory where imperial oversight from the Holy Roman Empire was inconsistently enforced, leaving local ecclesiastical and comital authorities considerable latitude in coinage decisions. The "var." designation against Dann Sa#502 suggests this piece departs from the cataloged type in at least one die characteristic — likely a legend variation or cross form — making precise attribution dependent on direct comparison with the Ilisch corpus.