See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Mun Chin

Issuer Korea
Year 1695-1742
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Medal alignment ↑↑
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description The reverse features two Chinese characters flanking the central square hole, identifying the issuing mint and series number. The mint mark 賑 (Chin), denoting the Seoul Charity Office (Jinheulcheong), appears at the top position, while a series numeral is placed at the bottom. The illustrated example shows 三 (3), indicating Series 3 of this issue. The characters are cast in regular script within a plain field, with no additional decorative elements.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Seoul Charity Office (賑恤廳, Jinheulcheong)
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The 1 Mun coins issued under the Joseon dynasty's Sangpyeong Tongbo series were produced at dozens of authorized furnaces across the country — military offices, royal bureaus, Buddhist temples — each assigned a distinct reverse inscription to identify the source mint. KM#157 represents one configuration within that sprawling, administratively complex system, which the government periodically expanded or contracted depending on whether currency oversupply was driving inflation. By the early 18th century, copper cash had penetrated rural markets deeply enough that the court debated whether further minting was doing more harm than good.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE