| Issuer | Friedberg, Burgraviate of |
|---|---|
| Year | 1685-1686 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | 1 Kreuzer (1⁄72) |
| Currency | Thaler |
| Composition | Silver |
| Weight | |
| Diameter | |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round |
| Technique | |
| Orientation | |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | KM#56 |
| Obverse description | Crowned two-fold arms in laurel wreath. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | |
| Obverse lettering | |
| Reverse description | Four-line inscription with denomination and date in laurel wreath. |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering | 1 KREU TZER 1686 |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
1685 - - 1686 - - |
| Numisquare ID | 1525357740 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: Philip Adolphus of Rau of Holzhausen, Burgrave of Friedberg, issued this 1 Kreuzer during a period of complex political fragmentation within the Holy Roman Empire. From 1685-1686, this coinage underscored Friedberg's semi-autonomous status as an Imperial City and Burgraviate. Such issues were vital for local commerce and served as tangible assertions of the Burgrave's sovereign rights, reflecting the intricate tapestry of power in late 17th-century Germany where numerous small entities maintained their own economic sovereignty through coinage.
Artistry: Artistically, this Kreuzer likely adheres to the provincial German Baroque style, characterized by a formal heraldic presentation rather than elaborate portraiture, typical for low denominations. While the engraver remains anonymous, the design would feature the Burgrave's name and title, often surrounding a prominent shield displaying the arms of Rau of Holzhausen and Friedberg. The reverse typically bore the Imperial eagle or a cross, alongside the denomination and date, executed with practical clarity over intricate detail, reflecting the local mint's capabilities.
Technical/Grading: From a technical standpoint, the high-points for grading typically include the details of the central shield's charges, the legends, and any elements of the Imperial eagle or cross. Given the era and mint, strike quality can vary significantly; well-struck examples exhibit sharp legends and full device details. Less common are perfectly centered strikes or flans free of minor irregularities. Die wear and inconsistent pressure often lead to areas of weakness, particularly at the periphery, which are important considerations for assessing condition.