See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Groschen - Ernest Frederick

Issuer Baden-Durlach, Margraviate of
Year 1595-1596
Type Log in to see details
Value 3 Kreuzer (1/20)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Central quartered shield bearing the arms of Baden-Durlach, divided into four quarters with heraldic devices including a lion and diagonal stripes, surmounted by the last two digits of the date (95 or 96) above the shield. The entire composition is enclosed within a beaded inner circle, with the margravial titles of Ernst Friedrich rendered in Latin legend occupying the outer annular field.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage 1595 - (15)95 -
1596 - (15)96 -
Additional information

Ernest Frederick ruled Baden-Durlach from 1584 until his death in 1604, a reign complicated by the division of Baden between the Catholic Baden-Baden and Protestant Baden-Durlach lines — a confessional split that hardened considerably in the years this coin was struck, just as the wider German territories braced for the conflicts that would eventually erupt in 1618. Small silver groschen issues of this type circulated heavily in the Upper Rhine region, passing through markets in Pforzheim and Durlach with little ceremony.

The two-year span of this issue, 1595–1596, likely reflects a short-term minting contract or a constrained silver supply rather than any policy decision.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE