Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Grand Duchy of Lithuania |
|---|---|
| Year | 1545-1559 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | 2.45 g |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | 1545 - Kopicki 3288; Gum. 614 - 1545 - Kopicki 3289; Gum. 613 - 1545 - Kopicki 3290; Gum. 612 - 1545 - Kopicki 3291 - 1545 - Kopicki 3292 - 1546 - Kopicki 3293; Gum. 615 - 1555 - Kopicki 3294; Gum. 615 - 1556 - Kopicki 3295; Gum. 615 - 1557 - Kopicki 3296; Gum. 615 - 1559 - Kopicki 3297; Gum. 615 - |
| Additional information |
Sigismund II Augustus ruled Lithuania and Poland at a moment of acute monetary disorder — multiple competing mints, debased coinages from neighboring states flooding markets, and constant pressure from the Sejm to reform the system. The groat issues of this period were struck across at least two Lithuanian mints, Vilnius being primary, with die work varying considerably across the span of these reference numbers. The Kopicki listings alone differentiate five varieties within this type, suggesting meaningful die changes rather than trivial punctuation differences.
These early-bust emissions preceded the 1569 Union of Lublin, when Lithuanian coinage retained a distinct administrative identity from the Polish issues struck in parallel.