See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Farthing - Charles I Richmond issue, mule of types 4 and 3

Issuer England
Year 1632
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Sp#3185/4
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Central device of an Irish harp with an eagle-headed, hook-fronted neck, displaying five strings, surmounted by a royal crown adorned with nine jewels. The harp is rendered in a characteristic early Stuart style with a curved forepillar. The Latin legend is distributed around the periphery within a beaded border, each word separated by stops.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering FRA! ET HIB! REX.
(Translation: King of France and Ireland)
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The Richmond farthings were produced under a royal patent granted to James Stewart, Duke of Richmond and Lennox, in 1625 — a privatized coinage arrangement that effectively farmed out small-denomination copper production to a patentee rather than the Crown directly. This mule, combining obverse and reverse dies from two consecutive types, almost certainly arose from the practical reality of patent coinage workshops: dies were expensive, changeovers were gradual, and mixed pairings were tolerated so long as the flans kept moving.

Stewart died in 1624, meaning the patent passed to his widow Frances before eventually reverting. The administrative turbulence across the patent's lifetime makes precise attribution of transitional pieces genuinely difficult.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE