| Emissor | Maccagno (Italian States) |
|---|---|
| Ano | 1622 |
| Tipo | Standard circulation coin |
| Valor | 1 Zecchino |
| Moeda | Zecchino (1618-1645) |
| Composição | Gold (.986) |
| Peso | 3.5 g |
| Diâmetro | |
| Espessura | |
| Formato | Round |
| Técnica | |
| Orientação | Medal alignment ↑↑ |
| Gravador(es) | |
| Em circulação até | |
| Referência(s) | MIR LOM#342 , KM#20 , Fr#501 |
| Descrição do anverso | Giacomo standing facing in inner circle. |
|---|---|
| Escrita do anverso | Latin |
| Legenda do anverso | ONG IAC MAN CO MAC C R |
| Descrição do reverso | Crowned arms in inner circle. |
| Escrita do reverso | Latin |
| Legenda do reverso | SAQRI QVE ROM IMP VIC PERPET 1622 |
| Bordo | |
| Casa da moeda | |
| Tiragem |
ND (1622) - - 1622 - - |
| ID Numisquare | 1595803380 |
| Informações adicionais |
Historical Context: The 1622 Ducato of Giacomo III Mandelli from Maccagno encapsulates the fragmented political landscape of 17th-century Italian States. Giacomo III was the final feudal lord of Maccagno Inferiore, an imperial fief nestled within the Duchy of Milan. Issuing coinage was a potent symbol of his sovereign authority, exercised by numerous minor principalities and lordships during an era of shifting alliances. This gold ducato represents a tangible assertion of independence before the eventual absorption of such small entities into larger territorial states.
Artistry: While the specific engraver for this ducato remains unrecorded, the coin’s design reflects a provincial interpretation of early Baroque aesthetics, likely by a local artisan. Typical for ducats, the obverse would likely feature the bust of Giacomo III Mandelli, or his prominent dynastic coat of arms. The reverse would commonly display a religious figure, a saintly patron, or a stylized cross, often accompanied by the Mandelli family motto or a legend proclaiming the ruler’s title.
Technical/Grading: Struck in high-purity gold (.986 fine) to a standard weight of 3.5 grams, this ducato’s technical strike quality can vary. Common for smaller mints, planchet preparation and striking pressure might be inconsistent, potentially leading to areas of weakness on high points, such as the ruler’s hair, crown, or intricate coat of arms details. Collectors should examine for full details on central devices, evenness of strike, and any evidence of die wear or planchet flaws inherent to 17th-century production.