Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Mint of Breslau (Wrocław) |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1620 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Gold (.986) |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Crowned rampant Bohemian lion facing left, with a four-fold coat of arms bearing a central shield of the Electoral Palatinate superimposed upon the lion's body. The composition is rendered in a bold, late Renaissance style typical of Silesian hammered gold coinage. The circumferential Latin legend incorporates the mint authority of the city of Wrocław (Breslau) and the date of issue at the legend's terminus. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | MONE • AVRE • S • P • Q • WRATISLAV • 1620 • |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Struck the same year the Bohemian revolt collapsed at White Mountain, this Breslau ducat was produced as the Habsburgs reasserted control over Silesia following decades of uneasy Protestant tolerance. Ferdinand II had been elected Holy Roman Emperor only the previous year, and his Silesian mints were actively demonstrating loyalty — and financial utility — to the new regime. Breslau's output in 1620 sits at an awkward intersection of political submission and municipal pride, the city retaining mint rights it would gradually lose over the following decades of Counter-Reformation consolidation.