目录
查看完整图片 — 免费注册
使用Google继续 — 免费
或用邮箱注册
为什么需要注册？只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证！
| 正面描述 | Central field occupied by multiple horizontal lines of Arabic Kufic inscription arranged within an inner linear border, typical of Eastern Islamic dirham design of the early 5th century AH. The legends reference religious formulae and the issuing authority. A marginal inscription runs along the outer circle within a second linear border, framing the entire field. The surfaces display the characteristic flat, broad flan associated with hammered silver dirhams of the Transoxianan tradition. Strike is slightly off-center with the irregular flan edge partially cutting into the outer marginal legend. |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 正面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 边缘 | Plain. |
| 铸币厂 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸造量 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 附加信息 |
Khuttal occupied a strategically awkward position in the upper Oxus region, nominally subject to whichever power could project force into its mountain valleys. When Mas'ud I consolidated Ghaznavid control across Khurasan and the eastern territories after his father Mahmud's death in 1030, local amirs like Al-Harith ibn Mansur had little choice but to acknowledge him on the coinage — the khuṭba and mint inscription being the two public acts that confirmed political submission. That this issue cites Mas'ud rather than a Samanid or Qarakhanid claimant places it squarely within the decade of peak Ghaznavid eastern reach, before Dandanaqan in 1040 unraveled it.