Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

1 Dinar - Radu I Type Ia

Uitgever Wallachia
Jaar 1377-1383
Type Standard circulation coin
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Central device consisting of a vertically divided heraldic shield: the dexter half charged with four horizontal bars, the sinister half plain. Stylized fleur-de-lis ornaments appear above and flanking the shield on both sides. The circular legend in uncial Latin characters runs along the coin's periphery, partially obscured by the irregular flan edge. The overall style is characteristic of 14th-century Wallachian hammered silver coinage, reflecting strong Hungarian heraldic influence.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde MONADA RADOWIWODA
(Translation: Coin of voivode Radu.)
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Radu I's dinars were minted in the decade following Wallachia's consolidation under his brother Vladislav I, whose own coinage this type closely echoes — a deliberate continuity signal from a ruler navigating vassalage pressures from both Hungary and the Ottoman sultanate simultaneously. The MBR 44–49 range distinguishes several die variants within this type, differences subtle enough that misattribution between subtypes was common in older Romanian numismatic literature.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT