目录
| 发行方 | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| 年份 | 150-250 |
| 类型 | Standard circulation coin |
| 面值 | 1 Denarius = 1/25 Aureus |
| 货币 | Aureus (circa 150-325) |
| 材质 | Silver |
| 重量 | 2.91 g |
| 直径 | |
| 厚度 | |
| 形状 | Round (irregular) |
| 制作工艺 | Hammered |
| 方向 | |
| 雕刻师 | |
| 流通至 | |
| 参考资料 |
| 正面描述 | Laureate bust facing right surrounded by legend. |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | Latin |
| 正面铭文 | [...]AIICICNOOCVAIVVVIMAVCCCIC[...] |
| 背面描述 | Person standing while facing left holding caduceus and cornucopia, all surrounded by legend. |
| 背面文字 | Latin |
| 背面铭文 | IICCCIVV[...]IVIVIILII |
| 边缘 | Smooth. |
| 铸币厂 | |
| 铸造量 |
ND (150-250) - Imitating Rome mint - |
| Numisquare 编号 | 4017899690 |
| 附加信息 |
Historical Context: This denarius, imitating Trajan's coinage (98-117 AD), was produced by uncertain Germanic tribes between 150 and 250 AD. Its creation, well after Trajan's reign, highlights the enduring prestige and monetary utility of Roman silver currency among Rome's northern neighbors. These imitations filled a critical need for coinage in regions with inconsistent Roman supply, facilitating trade and demonstrating an understanding of monetary economics. They often replicated Roman currency for local circulation during a period of increasing Roman-Germanic interaction and conflict, particularly leading into the Crisis of the Third Century.
Artistry: The engraver remains anonymous, likely a local craftsman from a Germanic tribe. The stylistic school is characteristic of "barbaric" imitations, prioritizing recognizable form over precise detail. While attempting to replicate a Trajanic denarius, the design typically exhibits simplified, often crude, features in the imperial portrait, frequently distorting the original Roman prototype. Legends, if present, are often blundered, incomplete, or illegible, reflecting a lack of Latin understanding or a deliberate simplification, focusing on visual cues of value rather than textual accuracy.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 2.91 grams, this imitation denarius falls within the expected range for such copies, often being slightly lighter than official Roman issues. High-points on the obverse, such as the emperor's hair, ear, and bust, are likely weakly struck or poorly defined due to less sophisticated die-engraving and striking techniques. The flan may be irregular or show evidence of an off-center strike. The silver content, while present, could be of variable purity, and the overall strike quality is generally inferior to official Roman mint products, reflecting local production limitations.