See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Cent Sierra Leone Company/Madras Presidency Mule

Issuer Sierra Leone Company
Year 1797-1800
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Round
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description A boldly rendered lion in a crouching, prowling posture occupies the central field, depicted with a highly detailed mane and raised hindquarters, set upon a rocky ground line. The design is engraved in high relief in the style of Conrad Heinrich Küchler of the Soho Mint. The peripheral legend reads SIERRA LEONE COMPANY arching above, with AFRICA appearing in the lower exergual area. The overall composition conveys the heraldic character associated with the Sierra Leone Company's colonial coinage of the late eighteenth century.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Latin
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The Sierra Leone Company, chartered in 1792 to administer the abolitionist settlement at Freetown, contracted Matthew Boulton's Soho Mint to produce coinage for the colony. Somehow — almost certainly through a die management error at Soho — a reverse die intended for the Madras Presidency's East India Company coinage was paired with the Sierra Leone obverse, producing this mule. Boulton was simultaneously striking coins for multiple colonial clients, and the Soho operation's sheer volume made such pairings an occasional, if embarrassing, outcome.

The piece is listed as a pattern-mule in most references, suggesting it never achieved intentional circulation. The Madras connection dates the error to the same window when Boulton held the EIC contract.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE