Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

1 Cash - Đại Trị Nguyên Bảo, Grass script

Uitgever Empire of Vietnam
Jaar 1358-1369
Type Standard circulation coin
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Four Chinese characters rendered in cursive grass script (caoshu) are arranged clockwise around a central square hole, reading 大治元寶 (Đại Trị Nguyên Bảo). The characters are boldly cast in raised relief within the flat field, with the fluid, abbreviated strokes characteristic of grass script giving the legend a distinctly calligraphic appearance. A plain raised rim encircles the design. The coin shows a green patina consistent with aged copper alloy.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Issued under Trần Dụ Tông, whose reign was marked by administrative neglect and a court increasingly consumed by factionalism, these cash coins were produced during a period when the Trần dynasty was visibly losing its grip on the Red River Delta. The "grass script" rendering of the inscription — a more cursive, abbreviated form — distinguishes this variety from the standard clerical-script emissions and points to different die-cutting hands within the same mint operation.

Toda's original classification left several die variants unresolved, and Hartill's 25.4 attribution captures only part of the known range. The square central hole placement and flan preparation show considerable inconsistency across surviving examples.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT