Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Türgesh Khaganate |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 716-750 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | 1 mm |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | Central square hole surrounded by a raised square border, with a large single tamgha (tribal emblem) prominently cast in the field to one side of the central perforation. A brief runic or Sogdian inscription, 'ᚱ prn' (meaning 'Coin'), appears in the field adjacent to the tamgha. The design is sparse, with the tamgha serving as the dominant visual element, rendered in bold cast relief. The outer rim is plain and slightly raised, consistent with the casting technique typical of Türgesh coinage. |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Plain |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
The Türgesh Khaganate rose to prominence in the Semirechye region after displacing the Western Türks in the early 8th century, and their coinage reflects a monetary system still finding its footing — heavily influenced by Sogdian and Chinese models without fully committing to either. The tamgha on these issues functioned as a dynastic mark of authority rather than a mint identifier in any administrative sense.
Attribution within this series remains genuinely contested. Smirnova's catalog work drew heavily on Soviet-era excavation finds from the Chuy Valley, and the "Anonymous" designation here reflects not laziness but the real difficulty of anchoring specific types to named khagans within the 716–750 window.