Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Türgesh Khaganate |
|---|---|
| Year | 716-750 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Cast |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Central square perforation framed by a raised square border, surrounded by a four-character Sogdian legend disposed around the hole in the annular field. The cursive Sogdian script reads 'bgy twrkys x`g`n pny', translating as 'Coin of the Master, Türgesh Khagan', and is executed in a flowing, somewhat worn relief characteristic of early 8th-century Central Asian cast coinage. A plain raised rim encloses the entire design. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | bgy twrkys x`g`n pny (Translation: Coin of the Master, Türgesh Khagan) |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The Türgesh replaced the Second Turkic Khaganate across Semirechye and the Chu Valley following the Turkic civil conflicts of the early 8th century, and their coinage reflects a transitional monetary culture heavily influenced by Sogdian commercial practice. This type copies the square-holed Chinese cash format but circulated in a region where Tang China, the Abbasid Caliphate, and the steppe confederacies were actively contesting control — the Türgesh themselves halted the Arab advance at the Battle of the Pass in 731.
The tamgha served as dynastic identifier in the absence of a named ruler, which is why attribution to specific khagans within the 716–750 bracket remains unresolved in the literature.