Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| Year | 276-325 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | 3.85 g |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | XXXX - XEXXX |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Barbarian imitations of Probus aurei occupy an awkward scholarly space — clearly produced by Germanic groups familiar enough with Roman coinage to copy the format convincingly, yet operating entirely outside imperial minting infrastructure. The dating range reflects genuine uncertainty: production likely began while Probus still reigned and continued well into the Constantinian period, as Roman gold remained the prestige currency of choice across the Rhine frontier regardless of which emperor's face it bore.
The Calicó cross-reference is telling. Even within Hispano-Roman numismatic literature, no clean parallel exists.