Catalog
| Issuer | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| Year | 290-325 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Aureus (circa 150-325) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Laureate, draped, and cuirassed bust of a Roman emperor effigy facing right, rendered in a crude barbarous style characteristic of Germanic imitative coinage. The portrait displays simplified facial features with a pronounced profile, the cuirass indicated by schematic incised lines at the shoulder. A blundered Latin legend of debased lettering surrounds the bust, the individual characters partially recognizable but largely garbled, reflecting the non-Roman engraver's unfamiliarity with the script. The coin bears a suspension hole at the top, indicating secondary use as a pendant or personal ornament. Overall execution betrays a hand working from a Roman aureus prototype without full comprehension of the original design. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | EISIIOIE[...]ECCHHFMC |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Barbarous gold imitations of late Roman aurei present one of the more persistent identification problems in late antique numismatics. These pieces were struck by Germanic groups — most likely Alamanni or Franks operating along the Rhine frontier — who had absorbed enough Roman coin through trade, tribute, and military service to understand the political weight of gold coinage, but reproduced it on their own terms. The prototypes being imitated here fall within the reigns of the soldier-emperors following Gallienus, a period when imperial portraiture itself was already becoming formulaic and abstracted.
The weight of 5.64 g sits comfortably within acceptable aureus range for the period, which complicates attribution further — these were not token copies but functional gold, treated as bullion by weight.