Catalog
| Issuer | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| Year | 290-325 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | A fantastical or mythological scene depicting a figure with a bird-like head mounted upon a wolf-headed, multi-legged creature striding to the right, rendered in the crude, imaginative style typical of barbarous Germanic imitative coinage. The composition likely derives from a misunderstood Roman reverse type, with the engraver reinterpreting human and animal forms into hybrid creatures. The surrounding field contains a blundered, pseudo-Latin legend of garbled characters, partially legible but largely corrupted. The overall flat relief and schematic treatment of forms are consistent with non-Roman workshop production. The reverse demonstrates the significant degree of artistic abstraction that occurs when Roman numismatic iconography is transmitted through non-literate Germanic intermediaries. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | O - [...]II8OCII - CH8IH - E |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Barbarous gold imitations of late Roman aurei present one of the more persistent identification problems in late antique numismatics. These pieces were struck by Germanic groups — most likely Alamanni or Franks operating along the Rhine frontier — who had absorbed enough Roman coin through trade, tribute, and military service to understand the political weight of gold coinage, but reproduced it on their own terms. The prototypes being imitated here fall within the reigns of the soldier-emperors following Gallienus, a period when imperial portraiture itself was already becoming formulaic and abstracted.
The weight of 5.64 g sits comfortably within acceptable aureus range for the period, which complicates attribution further — these were not token copies but functional gold, treated as bullion by weight.