Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | East India Company |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1797 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Medal alignment ↑↑ |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | AUSPICIO REGIS ET SENATUS ANGLIAE UNITED EAST INDIA COMPANY 48 TO ONE RUPEE (Translation: By the authority of the King and Parliament of England) |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | The bale mark of the United East India Company occupies the central field, comprising the characteristic interlaced cipher of the Company. A broad, flat raised rim surrounds the device, bearing the incuse circumferential legend UNITED EAST INDIA COMPANY followed by the date 1797, the whole presenting a bold and austere official character typical of Company coinage of this period. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The 1797 Madras Presidency copper dub sits at an odd intersection of colonial monetary pragmatism and local South Indian convention. The East India Company inherited a fragmented coinage system across its Indian territories and repeatedly struggled to impose standardization — the tiny 1/48 rupee denomination survived precisely because local bazaar trade demanded it, regardless of what the Company's accountants preferred.
Pridmore lists two varieties for this date, distinguished by minor die differences in the exergue treatment.