Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

1/4 Thaler - Anthony Ulrich Death

Uitgever Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel, Principality of
Jaar 1704
Type Commemorative circulation coin
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde The obverse displays the elaborate quartered coat of arms of the Duchy of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel, surmounted by a large ducal crown flanked by two smaller crowns and elaborate foliate mantling. The shield is divided into multiple quarters bearing the heraldic devices of Brunswick, Lüneburg, and associated territories, including rampant lions, a white horse, and other dynastic charges. A mint initial 'R' appears within the field. The circular Latin legend reads D G RUDOLPH AUGUSTUS DUX BR & LUNEB, identifying the reigning duke Rudolf Augustus, by the grace of God Duke of Brunswick and Lüneburg. The entire design is executed in high relief with fine baroque decorative detail.
Schrift voorzijde Latin
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Anthony Ulrich ruled Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel for over half a century and died in 1714 — which immediately raises a problem: a death memorial issue dated 1704 is almost certainly a misattribution or a cataloging error, as the duke was very much alive that year. The more plausible reading is that this is a thaler struck in 1714 to mark his passing, with the date misread or transposed somewhere in the cataloging chain. Welter 1851 confirms the memorial context; the discrepancy is worth flagging before acquisition.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT