Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Lombardy |
|---|---|
| Year | 568-690 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | 0.49 g |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | An open staurogram (Christogram cross with the rho element) occupies the centre of the field, with a small dot or pellet positioned above the crossbar, and a six-pointed star in each lateral field. The entire device is enclosed within a wreath border rendered in the hammered style. The composition is bold and schematic, consistent with Lombard ecclesiastical-influenced coinage of the late sixth to seventh century. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The Lombards entered Italy in 568 under Alboin, displacing Byzantine authority across the north with unusual speed, yet their earliest silver coinage mimicked imperial types — invoking Justin II's name on coins struck decades after any meaningful Byzantine presence in Lombardy had collapsed. This was political theater in metal: legitimacy borrowed from Constantinople by a people who had just dismantled its administrative reach.
The open staurogram variant with dot above is a recognized sub-type within this series, distinguishable from related issues catalogued across DOC, MEC, and BMC — the slight divergence in cross form reflecting workshop variation rather than intentional iconographic revision.