See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1/4 Siliqua In the name of Justin I and Theoderic, Sirmium, retrograde S with flat bust

Issuer Gepid Kingdom
Year 518-526
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight 0.79 g
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Pearl-diademed, draped, and cuirassed bust of Emperor Justin I facing right, rendered in a flat, barbarian style characteristic of Gepid coinage. The effigy is positioned within a beaded border and surrounded by a retrograde or corrupted Latin legend. The portraiture reflects the reduced technical skill of the Gepid mint at Sirmium, with simplified facial features and schematic drapery. The bust occupies the central field, with the legend distributed around the periphery.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The Gepids occupied Sirmium — a city the Romans had ranked among the four most important in the empire — after the collapse of Hunnic power in the 450s, and they understood exactly what minting coinage in the names of Roman emperors was worth politically. Striking in Justin I's name while Theoderic still lived placed this issue in the precise diplomatic window when the Gepids were navigating loyalty signals to both Ravenna and Constantinople simultaneously.

The retrograde S is not an error. It appears consistently enough across the type to be a deliberate workshop convention, possibly a celator's mark or a regional habit of the Sirmium die-cutters working outside mainstream imperial production.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE