Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Gepid Kingdom |
|---|---|
| Year | 518-526 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | 0.79 g |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Central field features the monogram of Theoderic, the Ostrogothic king, surmounted by a cross above. The monogram is rendered in a bold, angular style typical of late antique and early medieval Germanic coinage, set within a beaded border. A Latin legend, partially garbled and reflecting the barbarian engraver's limited familiarity with the script, surrounds the central device. The overall design imitates imperial Roman silver coinage conventions while displaying distinctly provincial execution. |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The Gepids occupied Sirmium — a city the Romans had ranked among the four most important in the empire — after the collapse of Hunnic power in the 450s, and they understood exactly what minting coinage in the names of Roman emperors was worth politically. Striking in Justin I's name while Theoderic still lived placed this issue in the precise diplomatic window when the Gepids were navigating loyalty signals to both Ravenna and Constantinople simultaneously.
The retrograde S is not an error. It appears consistently enough across the type to be a deliberate workshop convention, possibly a celator's mark or a regional habit of the Sirmium die-cutters working outside mainstream imperial production.