| 発行体 | Gepid Kingdom |
|---|---|
| 年号 | 491-504 |
| 種類 | Standard circulation coin |
| 額面 | 1/4 Siliqua |
| 通貨 | Siliqua (491-567) |
| 材質 | Silver |
| 重量 | 0.77 g |
| 直径 | 14.5 mm |
| 厚さ | |
| 形状 | Round (irregular) |
| 製造技法 | Hammered |
| 向き | |
| 彫刻師 | |
| 流通終了年 | |
| 参考文献 | MEC I#– |
| 表面の説明 | Pearl-diademed, draped, and cuirassed bust facing right and surrounded by legend. |
|---|---|
| 表面の文字体系 | Latin |
| 表面の銘文 |
D N ANVSTAIVS PP V (Translation: Our Lord, Anastasius, perpetual August) |
| 裏面の説明 | Two figures facing each other while holding a cross between them. |
| 裏面の文字体系 | |
| 裏面の銘文 | |
| 縁 | Smooth. |
| 鋳造所 | |
| 鋳造数 |
ND (491-504) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 1122931310 |
| 追加情報 |
Historical Context:This 1/4 Siliqua, struck by the Gepid Kingdom at Sirmium (491-504) in the name of Byzantine Emperor Anastasius I, illuminates early 6th-century Pannonia's complex geopolitics. The Gepids, controlling Sirmium, strategically acknowledged Byzantine suzerainty via coinage, fostering economic and diplomatic ties with Constantinople while asserting local authority. This MEC I#– unlisted issue confirms Sirmium's minting significance and provides rare numismatic evidence of Gepidic quasi-independent monetary policy under nominal imperial oversight.
Artistry:Gepidic numismatic artistry from Sirmium typically exhibits a syncretic blend of late Roman prototypes and local Germanic execution. Engraver identities are unknown; the stylistic school is defined by progressive simplification and abstraction of Byzantine imperial iconography. The Anastasian portrait, if present, would be a highly stylized rendition of official Constantinopolitan models, characterized by flattened features and reduced detail. Inscriptions often display irregular letterforms and varying legibility, indicative of regional minting practices.
Technical/Grading:For this 1/4 Siliqua, crucial grading points include legibility of the obverse legend (even if blundered) and clarity of the imperial bust's defining features (diadem, drapery). On the reverse, the integrity of the design, however minimal (e.g., cross), is paramount. Given the small flan (14.5 mm, 0.77 gg), strike centering and overall completeness of design elements are highly significant. Surface preservation, metal quality, and absence of significant flan irregularities are also critical.