Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Gepid Kingdom |
|---|---|
| Year | 493-526 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | 0.76 g |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Pearl-diademed, draped, and cuirassed bust of Emperor Anastasius I facing right, rendered in a flat, stylised barbaric manner characteristic of Gepid imitative coinage. The effigy is set within a beaded border and encircled by the imperial Latin legend. The workmanship reflects a provincial interpretation of late Roman imperial portraiture, with reduced anatomical detail typical of post-Roman Germanic mint output. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | D N ANASTASIVS PP AV (Translation: Dominus Noster Anastasius Perpetuus Augustus Our Lord, Anastasius, perpetual August) |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Sirmium, modern Sremska Mitrovica in Serbia, was among the most strategically contested cities of late antiquity — a former Roman imperial capital that passed to the Gepids following Theoderic's departure into Italy. These fractional silver pieces occupy a precise political moment: the Gepids operating nominally within the Ostrogothic and Byzantine orbit, invoking Anastasius I on coinage while exercising de facto independence in Pannonia. The retrograde S is not an error in any simple sense; it appears with enough consistency to suggest a mint operating at the edge of the trained engraver pool.