Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Gepid Kingdom |
|---|---|
| Year | 491-518 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | 0.40 g |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | D N ANAS - TASIVS (Translation: Our Lord, Anastasius) |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
After Theoderic's Ostrogothic forces took Sirmium from the Gepids in 504, the city briefly became a flashpoint of competing authority in the middle Danube. These fractional silver pieces, struck in the names of both the Byzantine emperor and Theoderic, reflect the layered legitimacy that barbarian rulers required — imperial sanction was not merely decorative but politically necessary for acceptance in trade and administration. The Gepid attribution remains debated among specialists, and the MEC I unlisted status underscores how few examples have been studied in a systematic context.