Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Edinburgh Mint |
|---|---|
| Year | 1675-1682 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1/4 Dollar (⅔) |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Laureate and draped bust of Charles II facing left, with long flowing curls falling behind the neck, the hair dressed with a laurel wreath tied at the rear with a ribbon bow. The truncation is unadorned. The portrait is rendered in high relief in the Restoration baroque style typical of Scottish milled coinage of the period. The peripheral legend is interrupted by the bust, reading · CAROLVS · II · to the left and · DEI · GRA · to the right, separated by pellet stops. The entire design is bounded by a beaded inner border and a reeded outer rim. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Reeded |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Charles II's Scottish coinage was administered separately from the English Royal Mint throughout his reign, with Edinburgh operating under a Master of the Mint who answered to the Scottish Privy Council rather than London. The second coinage series, authorised in the early 1670s, replaced a debased first issue that had drawn sustained complaints from Edinburgh merchants about inconsistent silver content. Production across the 1675–1682 window was irregular, tied directly to the availability of bullion at Holyrood, and surviving examples vary noticeably in strike quality for precisely that reason — not as a general characteristic of the type, but because the mint's supply chain was genuinely erratic.