1/4 Daalder Klippe, Siege of 1672

Emitent Deventer, City of
Rok 1672
Typ Emergency coin
Hodnota 1/4 Daalder (0.375)
Měna Gulden (1581-1795)
Složení Silver
Hmotnost 7.0 g
Průměr
Tloušťka
Tvar Square (irregular, Uniface)
Technika Hammered, Klippe
Orientace
Rytci
V oběhu do
Reference KM#71, Delmonte S#698, CNM#2.12.91, Maillet#15
Popis líce Deventer arms (crowned eagle facing with wings spread), rectangular stamp below with date.
Písmo líce Latin
Opis líce A•1672
(Translation: Year 1672)
Popis rubu Blank (uniface).
Písmo rubu
Opis rubu
Hrana
Mincovna
Náklad 1672 - -
ID Numisquare 1941684140
Další informace

Historical Context: The 1/4 Daalder Klippe from Deventer is a poignant relic of the "Rampjaar" (Disaster Year) of 1672, when the Dutch Republic faced invasion from multiple powers. Deventer, a vital city, was besieged by Bernhard von Galen, Bishop of Münster, known as "Bommen Berend." Struck under duress, this emergency coinage maintained economic stability and paid troops during the siege, underscoring the severe existential threat the city faced. Its issuance ceased with the city's surrender in June 1672.

Artistry: As typical for siege coinage, the artistry of the Deventer 1/4 Daalder Klippe prioritizes functionality over elaborate design. The engraver, likely an anonymous local craftsman working under pressure, adhered to a utilitarian stylistic school. The square klippe shape was chosen for rapid production from cut silver sheets. The design characteristically features the city's arms—a double-headed eagle—along with the denomination and date, all rendered in a direct, often somewhat crude, yet immediately recognizable manner.

Technical/Grading: The technical qualities of this klippe often reflect its emergency origins. Planchets are typically hand-cut, leading to irregular shapes, uneven edges, and varying thickness. The strike itself is frequently inconsistent; high-points on the double-headed eagle or klippe corners often exhibit weakness, while other areas may show strong detail. Off-center strikes and evidence of hurried production are common. Collectors should prioritize full impressions of central devices and clear date, as these factors significantly impact its numismatic grade and historical appeal.

×