کاتالوگ
| صادرکننده | Khanate of Khiva (Khiva Khanate) |
|---|---|
| سال | 1558-1602 |
| نوع | Standard circulation coin |
| ارزش | |
| واحد پول | |
| ترکیب | Silver |
| وزن | 2.25 g |
| قطر | 24 mm |
| ضخامت | |
| شکل | Round (irregular) |
| تکنیک | |
| جهت | |
| حکاک(ها) | |
| در گردش تا | |
| مرجع(ها) | Album Islamic#N3008 |
| توضیحات روی سکه | Arabic |
|---|---|
| خط روی سکه | Arabic |
| نوشتههای روی سکه | |
| توضیحات پشت سکه | Arabic |
| خط پشت سکه | Arabic |
| نوشتههای پشت سکه | |
| لبه | |
| ضرابخانه | |
| تیراژ ضرب |
ND (1558-1602) - Abiward - ND (1558-1602) - Unknown mint - |
| شناسه Numisquare | 7042327600 |
| اطلاعات تکمیلی |
Historical Context: This 1/2 Tanka was issued during Hajji Muhammad I Arabshahid's reign (1558-1602), a pivotal period for the Khanate of Khiva. As an Arabshahid Shaybanid, Hajji Muhammad consolidated Khivan authority amidst regional rivalries with Bukhara and Safavid Persia. His rule marked significant political stabilization and economic assertion, establishing Khiva as a distinct power. This silver tanka underscored the Khanate’s sovereignty and independence.
Artistry: The artistry of this 1/2 Tanka exemplifies traditional Islamic numismatic style. Crafted by anonymous court artisans, the design primarily features elegant Arabic calligraphy, likely Naskh or Thuluth script. Inscriptions typically conveyed the ruler’s name, titles, mint city (Khiva), and Hijri date. Adhering to Islamic aniconic principles, aesthetic emphasis lies in the precise arrangement and legibility of the script, reflecting religious devotion and the khan's authority.
Technical/Grading: As a hand-struck silver coin, the technical qualities of this 1/2 Tanka exhibit considerable variation. High-points for wear or strike typically include the central portions of the obverse and reverse inscriptions, particularly the ruler’s name and key religious phrases. Common characteristics include irregular flan shapes, off-center strikes, and areas of weak strike due to uneven hammer blows or worn dies. The 2.25 gram weight and 24 millimeter diameter suggest a thin flan, often contributing to these inconsistencies, making well-struck examples desirable.