Pratabgarh was among the smaller Rajput states that came under British paramountcy following the treaties of the early nineteenth century, yet continued striking coins in the name of the Mughal emperor Shah Alam II long after his death in 1806 — a fiction maintained by dozens of Indian princely mints well into the 1860s. The practice was partly ceremonial and partly a matter of monetary conservatism; local populations trusted the familiar regal formula regardless of whether the emperor named on the coin had reigned for decades or was long dead.
Dulep Singh served as the ruling thakur under whose authority these coins circulated within the state's limited local economy. The four-decade span of this type reflects how little pressure Pratabgarh faced to modernize its coinage before British colonial standardization eventually made indigenous princely issues obsolete.
Pratabgarh was among the smaller Rajput states that came under British paramountcy following the treaties of the early nineteenth century, yet continued striking coins in the name of the Mughal emperor Shah Alam II long after his death in 1806 — a fiction maintained by dozens of Indian princely mints well into the 1860s. The practice was partly ceremonial and partly a matter of monetary conservatism; local populations trusted the familiar regal formula regardless of whether the emperor named on the coin had reigned for decades or was long dead.
Dulep Singh served as the ruling thakur under whose authority these coins circulated within the state's limited local economy. The four-decade span of this type reflects how little pressure Pratabgarh faced to modernize its coinage before British colonial standardization eventually made indigenous princely issues obsolete.