Danh mục
| Đơn vị phát hành | Myanmar |
|---|---|
| Năm | 1143 (1782) |
| Loại | Standard circulation coin |
| Mệnh giá | ½ Pya (1⁄160) |
| Tiền tệ | First kyat (1852-1889) |
| Chất liệu | Copper |
| Trọng lượng | 4.56 g |
| Đường kính | |
| Độ dày | |
| Hình dạng | Round (irregular) |
| Kỹ thuật | Milled |
| Hướng | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Nghệ nhân khắc | |
| Lưu hành đến | |
| Tài liệu tham khảo |
| Mô tả mặt trước | Two Line Burmese Partial Legend |
|---|---|
| Chữ viết mặt trước | Burmese |
| Chữ khắc mặt trước | |
| Mô tả mặt sau | Two Fishes in upper center. |
| Chữ viết mặt sau | |
| Chữ khắc mặt sau | |
| Cạnh | Plain |
| Xưởng đúc | Kolkata / Calcutta / Murshidabad, India (1757-date) |
| Số lượng đúc | 1143 (1782) - 1782, but issued 1797 |
| ID Numisquare | 4993863211 |
| Thông tin bổ sung |
Historical Context: This ½ Pya copper coin, dated 1143 ME (1782 CE), marks the accession year of King Bodawpaya, a pivotal figure of the Konbaung Dynasty. His reign (1782-1819) ushered in a period of significant expansion, religious reform, and architectural ambition, including the construction of the Mingun Pagoda. This coin represents the nascent phase of his rule, establishing a new numismatic identity for the empire and serving as essential small denomination currency for daily commerce across his consolidating realm.
Artistry: The design of this copper ½ Pya likely reflects the traditional Burmese court style, executed by anonymous royal engravers. Typical motifs for Konbaung coinage include the stylized peacock, a prominent royal emblem, or the mythical chinthe lion, often depicted on one side. The reverse would feature the regnal year and denomination rendered in elegant Burmese script, embodying the aesthetic principles of the era which favored symbolic representation and clear epigraphy over intricate realism.
Technical/Grading: For this type, high-points susceptible to wear typically include the raised contours of the peacock’s feathers, the chinthe’s mane, or the apexes of the Burmese script characters. Technical strike quality often varies, with examples frequently exhibiting slight off-center strikes, weakness in central details, or minor planchet flaws common to hand-struck copper issues of the period. A well-struck example with sharp details across all elements is highly desirable.