Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Canadian provinces |
|---|---|
| Year | 1835 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1/2 Penny (1⁄480) |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Second crudely hand-cut effigy facing right, closely mirroring the obverse in style and execution, confirming the uniface double-headed nature of this regal imitation type. The portrait is similarly roughly engraved with minimal facial and drapery detail, set within a field largely devoid of inscription or decorative elements. A border of large, irregularly placed raised dots encircles the design at the rim, consistent with the primitive manufacture associated with the BL-21 series of Lower Canadian copper emergency tokens. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
By the 1830s, the chronic shortage of official small change in British North America had spawned an entire shadow economy of merchant tokens and imitation regal pieces. This uniface copper — struck with only one working die — was almost certainly produced by a private contractor exploiting that gap, never sanctioned by any colonial or imperial authority. The CCT BL-21 designation places it within a documented family of Baldwin-linked pieces, though attribution to a specific issuer remains contested among specialists.
Uniface production typically indicates an experimental strike, a collar failure, or a deliberate pattern piece rather than a coin intended for mass circulation.