Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Nova Scotia |
|---|---|
| Year | 1832 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Pound (1812-1860) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | A centrally placed Scottish thistle in full bloom, flanked on either side by leafy branches, occupies the field. The legend HALFPENNY TOKEN arcs around the upper portion of the coin, with the date 1832 displayed prominently in the lower exergue area. The design is contained within a dentilated border. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | 1832 - NS-1D1 - 800,000 1832 - NS-1D2 - 1832 - NS-1D3 - |
| Additional information |
Nova Scotia's colonial coinage in this period was driven almost entirely by the chronic shortage of small change — British regal copper rarely made it across the Atlantic in sufficient quantities, and American coins filled gaps unofficially. The 1832 issue was authorized by the Nova Scotia legislature and struck in Birmingham, part of a broader colonial practice of contracting private British minters to supply what the imperial system wouldn't.
Breton 871 is the standard attribution for this type, cross-referenced in the Charlton Colonial Token catalogue as NS-1D. Striking quality varies noticeably across surviving examples, a common outcome when colonial contracts prioritized volume over precision.