Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Naga dynasty of Narwar |
|---|---|
| Year | 200-340 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | 1.15 g |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | A stylized figure, likely a deity or auspicious symbol associated with the Naga dynastic tradition, depicted in a frontal or near-frontal stance occupying the central field. The design exhibits a schematic, almost abstract rendering characteristic of early medieval Indian copper coinage. Subsidiary elements and linear motifs surround the central device, though the details are partially obscured by the crude casting technique. The flan is irregular and the relief is shallow, typical of Naga series issues attributed to the Narwar rulers of the 3rd–4th century CE. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The Naga dynasties of north-central India — centered on sites including Narwar, Padmavati, and Mathura — operated as regional powers during the gradual fragmentation following the Kushana decline, issuing their own copper coinage before being absorbed by the expanding Gupta empire in the fourth century. The specific attribution to "Ganpati Naga" places this piece among a sequence of rulers whose dynastic order and precise reigns remain contested among scholars, with numismatic evidence often doing more interpretive work than any surviving inscription.