Catalogue
| Émetteur | Ghaznavid dynasty |
|---|---|
| Année | 998-1030 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Valeur | 1/2 Dirham (0.3) |
| Devise | Dinar (977-1186) |
| Composition | Silver |
| Poids | 1.2 g |
| Diamètre | 14 mm |
| Épaisseur | |
| Forme | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Medal alignment ↑↑ |
| Graveur(s) | |
| En circulation jusqu’à | |
| Référence(s) |
| Description de l’avers | |
|---|---|
| Écriture de l’avers | |
| Légende de l’avers | |
| Description du revers | |
| Écriture du revers | |
| Légende du revers | |
| Tranche | |
| Atelier | |
| Tirage |
ND (998-1030) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 5164106390 |
| Informations supplémentaires |
Historical Context: This 1/2 Dirham was issued during the reign of Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni (998-1030 CE), who elevated the Ghaznavid dynasty to its imperial zenith. His vast empire stretched from Central Asia to northern India, making him one of the most powerful Islamic rulers. Renowned for military prowess and patronage of arts, Mahmud's coinage served as a crucial medium for commerce across his diverse territories, symbolizing the economic stability and widespread influence of his domain.
Artistry: The design adheres to prevailing Islamic numismatic tradition, emphasizing epigraphy over figural representation. While no specific engraver is attributed, the stylistic school is distinctly Islamic Kufic, characterized by its angular, majestic script. The obverse typically features the Kalima (Shahada), often with central and marginal legends. The reverse displays the ruler's name, titles, mint, and date, condensed due to the coin's diminutive size, showcasing sophisticated calligraphic artistry.
Technical/Grading: Given its modest dimensions (14mm, 1.2g), strike quality of this 1/2 Dirham varies. High-points for evaluation include clarity and completeness of central legends, particularly vertical Kufic strokes, and marginal inscriptions. Full strikes are uncommon; minor off-centering, areas of weakness, or planchet irregularities (cracks, uneven shape) are frequently observed. Despite these, the silver purity was generally high, reflecting the integrity of the Ghaznavid monetary system.